Assessment by Claude (AI), October 2026, on a 0–100 scale: how confident one can be that each part represents the physics.
| 95 | The page computes the chain it states |
Every number matches an independent Python version to 0.1 %; the transport tables match direct calculations to 3–4 % (worst 9 %). |
| 60 | C₄₄ → ℏωsh: one shear mode sets the lattice timescale |
Coupling fluctuations come from a band of low-frequency modes, librations included. Simulations (Giannini et al. 2023) give ℏ/τ ≈ 9 meV for DNTT and 16 meV for C8-DNTT-C8; the chain gives 2.7 meV for C8-DNTT-C8. |
| 80 | ⟨u²⟩ from C₄₄ |
Classical harmonic lattice. For MT-pyrene the CIF displacement parameters (100–300 K) give a slide within about 13 % of the chain’s. |
| 70 | σJ = g·δu |
g is computed (DFT gradients of every bond, weighted by the measured motion), not fitted. C8-DNTT-C8 gets σJ = J/5.4; molecular dynamics give J/4–5. Assumes all rigid-body motion softens with C₄₄. |
| 85 | Transient localisation → Lτ, μ |
Established theory, solved on each crystal’s own network of transfer integrals. The weak-disorder correction is an interpolation, so the stiffest settings are the least secure. |
| 80 | Trends: stiffer is faster; μ ∝ T−n |
μ rises with C₄₄ at every setting. C8-DNTT-C8 gives n ≈ 1.1 at 300 K; experiment gives 1.0 ± 0.1 (Giannini et al., Nat. Mater. 2023). |
| 45 | Absolute mobility |
Intrinsic values (no traps) run above measured ones: C8-DNTT-C8 15 against 4.8, MT-pyrene 47 against 30 cm²V⁻¹s⁻¹. DNTT uses a placeholder C₄₄. |
| 45 | κL/κL,0 |
A scaling estimate (κ ∝ sound velocity cubed): right in direction, not in size. |
| 90 | Drawing |
The CIF molecules in their crystal orientations; slide from the chain, sideways motion and rocking in the measured proportions. DNTT moves too much because of its placeholder C₄₄. |
| 75 | Overall |
A faithful, internally consistent picture of the hypothesis and of how stiffness controls mobility; trends more reliable than absolute numbers. |